Itβs Not Age
Friends,
Some are characterizing this primary season as a time of generational change in which young insurgents are winning against old farts.
Wrong. Progressive populist fighters are winning against the moderately flatulent establishment.
Case in point: todayβs Massachusetts Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, in which 80-year-old incumbent Ed Markey defeated 47-year-old congressman Seth Moulton.
Markey is a progressive whoβs been in office for fifty years and was an early proponent of a βgreen new deal.β Moulton is known as a moderate who has questioned transgender girlsβ participation in girlsβ sports.
To be sure. youth has helped some challengers around the country. In Coloradoβs June primary, Diana DeGette, a 15-term incumbent, was defeated by 29-year-old Melta Kiros. DeGette took office four months before Kiros was even born. But I doubt Kirosβs youth was the deciding factor. She came through as being a fighter on the side of average working families.
Last month in Connecticut, 78-year-old Rep. John Larson was defeated by by former Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin, age 47. Again, Broninβs age certainly helped. But voters seemed to have responded more to his willingness to take on the establishment.
The big takeaway from this primary season isnβt one of βgenerational change.β Itβs the growing power of progressives, along with voterβs increasing suspicion of giant corporations, Big Tech, and the billionaire class.
The pattern is clear in the Democratic primaries but is also emerging in Republican ones. Weβre in a populist age. Inequalities of income, wealth, and power havenβt been this wide since the first Gilded Age. Voters donβt trust the establishment β and with good reason.
Check this story
Ask the guide
The guide explains what to check and where. It cannot see this article or recent news.
Is this AI-made?
AI checkers give a likelihood, not proof.
