Filter News

Where the source is based, not where the story happened.

Or choose step by step:

🏷️ Subjects tick one or more
πŸ“‘ Sources tick one or more, or none for all

AutoWar

βœ‰οΈ Robert Reich πŸ• October 1, 2026 at 10:36 AM
πŸ“ Source based in: World β€Ί Northern Hemisphere β€Ί North America β€Ί United States

Friends,

Imagine four of the most frighteningly irresponsible people in America deciding how AI will be put to use in the most frighteningly irresponsible way.

Pete Hegseth is one of them. Trump is another. The other two are Elon Musk and Newt Gingrich.

Hegseth says he’s tasking Musk and Gingrich with laying the groundwork for a new β€œAutonomous Warfare Command,” or AutoWarCom β€” a new Pentagon command operation for autonomous warfare. It would feature unmanned drones, autonomous sensors, unmanned boats, and other autonomous systems. Hegseth is proposing to triple spending on autonomous warfare to $74 billion.

Hegseth has also named as an adviser Palmer Luckey, a major Trump donor who designed the Oculus Rift, a virtually reality headset credited with reviving the virtual reality industry, and co-founded of Anduril Industires, a military tech company focused on autonomous drones and sensors.

The specter of autonomous lethal weapons β€” weapons that kill without human beings first deciding who, how, or when β€” is the nightmare of many who deal with AI. Autonomous AI weapons are fraught with unpredictability. And what happens when AI weapons escape their controls and go rogue, as recently occurred at OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Google?

Bad enough that Hegseth and Trump are pouring money into this. Worse that they’re setting up a separate military command for it. Worse still that they’re depending on Musk, Gingrich, and a virtual-reality game designer to tell them how.

I keep thinking I’ll wake up from this nightmare into a sane world.

Share

Check this story

Ask the guide

The guide explains what to check and where. It cannot see this article or recent news.

Is this AI-made?

AI checkers give a likelihood, not proof.