Trump administration targeting statesβ DHS grants to force voting changes, House Dems say

Booths await voters during the May 19, 2026, primary election at Temple View Elementary School in Idaho Falls, Idaho. (Photo by Pat Sutphin/Idaho Capital Sun)
The Federal Emergency Management Agencyβs guidelines to states on how to request funding under counterterrorism grant programs include potentially illegal demands related to election administration, Democrats on the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee said Thursday.
The Department of Homeland Security, which includes FEMA, sent states last month notices of available federal funding for non-disaster grants under the Homeland Security Grant Program, the Nonprofit Security Grant Program and the Transit Security Grant Program.
Those notices included βblatant attempts to force communities to comply with the Trump administrationβs political demandsβ or risk losing $200 million in federal funds, theΒ letter said.
βAs we approach the 25th anniversary of September 11th, it is deeply alarming that DHS and FEMA, under Donald Trump, continue to manipulate the very funding born out of a national tragedy,β they wrote. βPlaying political games with counterterrorism funding undermines public safety and deprives first responders of the resources they need to do their jobs.β
The panelβs 15 Democrats, led by ranking member Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, signed the letter to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and acting FEMA Administrator Robert Fenton.
Spokespeople for DHS, FEMA and the committeeβs Republicans did not immediately return messages seeking comment late Thursday. A White House spokesperson referred a request for comment to DHS.
SAVE computer system
The department is withholding up to 20% of the programsβ congressionally appropriated grant funding unless states and cities update their election laws, the Democrats wrote. The administration wants states to use the departmentβs powerful SAVE computer system to verify the citizenship of every voter, among other demands, the letter said.
The department also continues to retain more than $600 million in 2025 funding, the lawmakers said.
Some of the administrationβs demands are unworkable or illegal under federal court decisions or state law, they said.
For example, two days before the notice went to states, a federal judgeΒ ruled that states could not use the SAVE system to check voter eligibility.
βIt is unclear how or why DHS and FEMA published (notice of funding opportunity) guidance that would deliberately conflict with a court ruling,β they wrote. βTo date, FEMA has not provided a revised (notice) that complies with court orders on the use of the SAVE system.β
βCostly and impossibleβ for states
Several requirements, demanded barely five months before midterm elections in November and one month before grant applications are due, βare costly and impossible to achieve on the unrealistic timeline dictated by the administration,β the letter said.
Other criteria were unclear, such as a requirement to βreconcile voters and ballots using a methodology the Secretary has not disclosed,β the Democrats wrote. The department has also not said how post-election manual audits must be conducted.
The lawmakers asked the administration to revert to 2024 guidance, which would remove confusion about the grant programsβ requirements and their legality, release materials that informed the departmentβs decision to tie the grant funding to election security and to immediately release all holds βexplicit or de factoβ on last yearβs grants.
Constitutional mandateΒ
The changes would βvery likely harmβ statesβ election integrity, David Becker, the executive director and founder of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, said in a media briefing earlier Thursday.Β
Becker predicted that the order would be βvery easy to blockβ in court.
The departmentβs requirements are not authorized by Congress or the Constitution, which empowers states to administer elections, Becker said.
βThis administration continues to either fail to understand or openly defy the constitutional mandate that gives authority to run elections to the states,β he said.