Documents show DHS probed nonprofits, obtained 100 million records in hunt for noncitizen voters

Security stands outside ICE headquarters during a Congressional Hispanic Caucus rally on Feb. 3, 2026 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
The Department of Homeland Security obtained tens of millions of unspecified records as part of a sweeping nationwide effort to find voter fraud, according to internal DHS reports, and weighed using undercover agents to investigate voter registration efforts by nonprofit groups.
The reports from May and June by Homeland Security Investigations, a sub-agency of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, provide updates on its βelection integrityβ investigations. They are included in aΒ trove of documents obtained by the pro-democracy group Democracy Forward through a records request and released Wednesday.
The HSI reports detail an expansive review of nonprofit organizations involved in voter registration. A June 1 report says 82 βNGOsβ β nongovernmental organizations β had been reviewed in Pennsylvania alone. Groups in Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey and Ohio also came under scrutiny.
The June 1 report describes the potential for undercover operations, and refers to efforts across Homeland Security to identify organizations that βmay be predatory in nature, particularly those suspected of illegal alien registration and voter encouragement.β Organizations in New Jersey and Pennsylvania remained areas of focus, the report says.
βThe objective is to determine potential opportunities to leverage UC (undercover) resources, including the possible deployment of undercover agents (UCAs), to support investigative efforts in the field,β the report says.
Overall, the records offer a window into the Trump administrationβs push to root out voter fraud, and especially noncitizen voting, ahead of the midterm elections. While a few months old, they suggest that finding noncitizen voters was an active focus within Homeland Security Investigations, along with identifying any organizations suspected of registering noncitizens to vote.
Noncitizen voting
Noncitizen voting is a rare occurrence, studies have consistently found.Β
The Justice Department has brought a few dozen cases this year, and U.S Attorney General Todd Blanche in late SeptemberΒ announced indictments against 10 noncitizens over allegations of unlawfully voting. But the censusΒ reports 154 million people voted in the 2024 election.
With early voting beginning across many states, Trumpβs bid to assert authority over voting has largely failed. The U.S. Supreme CourtΒ blocked his plans to use the U.S. Postal Service to restrict mail ballots and the SAVE America Act, which would require voters to show proof of citizenship, stalled in Congress.
But Democrats, voting rights groups and some election officials are concerned Trump may take more extreme action in the coming weeks. They have braced forΒ possible federal interference, including the prospect of ICE or other federal agents deploying to the polls (Homeland Security denies any plans to target polling places).
βThis trove of ICE documents provides chilling new insights into the breadth and depth of the Trump-Vance administrationβs efforts to pursue baseless claims of widespread election fraud and assert greater federal control over elections ahead of the 2026 midterms,β Hart Wood, senior oversight counsel at Democracy Forward, said in a statement.
Homeland Security and ICE didnβt respond to questions on Wednesday.
At a news conference last week to announce indictments against alleged noncitizen voters in Minnesota, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said the Trump administration would never allow the votes of noncitizens to cancel out the votes of American citizens. He said that only citizens should be electing the countryβs leaders.
βOur message to aliens who vote in American elections is clear: We will find you, arrest you, and you will face the consequences, including criminal charges and deportation,β Mullin said.
Nonprofits reviewed, researchedΒ
The reports in the records obtained by Democracy Forward describe efforts by HSI to research and review an array of nonprofit groups. In some instances, HSI appeared satisfied after its examination.Β
The June 1 report notes that research was completed on approximately 41 non-governmental organizations in New Jersey, with βno derogatory informationβ found. Research on 20 nonprofit funds linked to a Washington, D.C.-based charitable foundation also turned up nothing, the report notes.
But the report also says the Pennsylvania chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations was βflagged for further investigation.β CAIR is one of the countryβs leading Muslim civil rights groups.
Ahmet Selim Tekelioglu, CAIR Pennsylvania executive director, in a statement said the organizationβs civic engagement programs have expanded over the years and include voter registration efforts that seek to ensure Muslim Americans are empowered to vote and fully engaged in the civic process.
βOur voter registration program follows all applicable voter registration rules and requirements,β Tekelioglu said.
Education Minnesota, an educators union, is named in the June 1 report as one of 22 organizations that HSI was beginning to research at the time. Monica Byron, Education Minnesotaβs president, said the organization learned of the investigation on Tuesday because of Democracy Forward.
Byron said the group shares Democracy Forwardβs concerns about potential government surveillance of lawful voter registration activities.Β
βWe do not know the details of any investigation into our union, but we will not be deterred in encouraging all eligible members to exercise their right to vote in the upcoming election,β Byron said in a statement.
Tens of millions of records
The HSI reports show that Heather Honey, a DHS official who came to prominence denying President Donald Trumpβs 2020 election loss, obtained 48.4 million records through βindependent sources of information.β Additionally, HSI drew upon some 50.6 million records from the Department of Justice.
The exact nature of the records isnβt described, but the DOJ has sued dozens of states for voter records, including sensitive personal information such as driverβs license and Social Security numbers. The department hasnβt won any of the lawsuits, but at least 16 states haveΒ voluntarily provided the data.
The Supreme CourtΒ ruled in September that states can use a powerful Homeland Security program called SAVE to help identify possible noncitizen voters after voting rights groups sued to block its use, alleging that it often relies on inaccurate data and has a track record of wrongly flagging U.S. citizens. The decisionβs impact on the midterms is expected to be minimal because most states are already too close to a federal election to conduct mass purges of voters.
But the HSI reports suggest that while the legal fight over SAVE was playing out in the courts, Homeland Security was nevertheless analyzing a vast collection of records for signs of voter fraud.
HSIβs June 1 report says 26,563 records derived from ICE had been prioritized for βdownstream vetting,β with a focus on Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio and Pennsylvania.Β
Priority states for HSIβs review of Justice Department records included those states, as well as Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia and Texas.
The report notes that records were sent to iLab β an apparent reference to HSIβs Innovation Lab β for βsecondary enrichment and identification of high-value targets.β
Jacob Fischler contributed to this report.
Check this story
Is this AI-made?
AI checkers give a likelihood, not proof.